The devil sure likes 'em small.
People are stupid cruel fucks, they really are.
From to day's tabloid de jour, the SUN.
"A FATHER who thought his two sons were possessed by the devil fastened their top and bottom lips together with safety pins, a court heard.
The Nigerian-born churchgoer, 47, cut their tongues with a scalpel to draw off blood.
Clothes pegs and pliers were also put on the boys’ tongues, it was claimed at Bradford Crown Court.
The children were aged between seven and ten at the time of the alleged assaults two years ago.
The father, from Bradford, West Yorkshire, denies unlawful wounding and cruelty.
His wife, 41, denies cruelty.
The trial continues."
Seriously, how fucking lame is the devil? Talk about your cowardly custards. Why doesn't he ever invade Jeremy Clarkson's body? Why not David 'not even slightly funny and never was or ever will be not in my life time or yours anyway the unfunny insulting gooch-faced twat' McSavage? How does Bertie's not get invaded? You'd imagine he would be pretty fertile host for a touring diablo, unless lord beelzebub is allergic to brass. Well?
It's always the kids. Little kids too. Sheesh, anyone would think the devil's got nothing better to do except go around infecting and possessing small children. But why? Bit futile surely? Since once he's in there his devilish way are easily overcome by pins and clothes pegs?
I would really like to take a set of pliars and a Black and Decker drill to the parents of these two children. I betcha it would not take very long to get them to admit that they too were 'possessed', but not by the devil, oh no, just by a fucked up deity that allows people to unleash wanton cruelty on the defenseless and the weak, in the name of their god.
From to day's tabloid de jour, the SUN.
"A FATHER who thought his two sons were possessed by the devil fastened their top and bottom lips together with safety pins, a court heard.
The Nigerian-born churchgoer, 47, cut their tongues with a scalpel to draw off blood.
Clothes pegs and pliers were also put on the boys’ tongues, it was claimed at Bradford Crown Court.
The children were aged between seven and ten at the time of the alleged assaults two years ago.
The father, from Bradford, West Yorkshire, denies unlawful wounding and cruelty.
His wife, 41, denies cruelty.
The trial continues."
Seriously, how fucking lame is the devil? Talk about your cowardly custards. Why doesn't he ever invade Jeremy Clarkson's body? Why not David 'not even slightly funny and never was or ever will be not in my life time or yours anyway the unfunny insulting gooch-faced twat' McSavage? How does Bertie's not get invaded? You'd imagine he would be pretty fertile host for a touring diablo, unless lord beelzebub is allergic to brass. Well?
It's always the kids. Little kids too. Sheesh, anyone would think the devil's got nothing better to do except go around infecting and possessing small children. But why? Bit futile surely? Since once he's in there his devilish way are easily overcome by pins and clothes pegs?
I would really like to take a set of pliars and a Black and Decker drill to the parents of these two children. I betcha it would not take very long to get them to admit that they too were 'possessed', but not by the devil, oh no, just by a fucked up deity that allows people to unleash wanton cruelty on the defenseless and the weak, in the name of their god.
Labels: suffering.
posted by fatmammycat at 11:04 a.m.
34 Comments:
That is horrendous. I bet they got off with it because they are black or Christian or insane or some under pathetic reason. When are the courts going to stop tiptoeing around issues of race and religion and just call a spade a spade. They abused their children they should go to prison. The judicial system is ridiculous. What about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? Surely this should be a priority.
PS Himself will get great mileage out of this
At least they're in court over it. Fucked up shits. I really think people who abuse children ought to be horsewhipped.
And SALTED!
Quite right, and salted.
I have just caught my thumb in my drawer. If childbirth is more painful than this I will sow my fanny up this afternoon and tell then paramour to go find himself a new brood mare.
-n, it's the pain.
Ah ha ha ha that is hilarious are you planning a spawning a few soon. Why don’t you just meet the paramour half way, he can practice making babies with you but you just refrain from delivering the goods. A win win situation I’d say.
"just call a spade a spade" Is Nonny for real?
By the way, speaking as a man and having witnessed it on a few occasions, I can assure you that childbirth is painless. It's certainly less painful than sowing up your fanny... although if you have an episiotomy...
So carry on as normal then? Okay, I can do that.
Bollocks, this day just keeps getting worse, now I must get dressed and go into town for a 'meeting' and that's nearly as painful to me as the thumb thing.
Oh Conan, thank heavens my eldest sister keeps telling me it hurts like shit, but if you say it doesn't....
Your eldest sister sounds like she's turning into your Ma.
Conan what did I say that was bad, I'm confussed, I just meant if he abused his children then that is the bottom line he should be excused becouse of religon or anything else. Why is that a bad thing to say?
Spade = coon, nigger, wog etc
Jesus Conan that is terrible, I didn't mean that at all nor have I ever heard such an association.I just meant call it like it is. Sometimes I think people look for things to pull me up on, I don't know why exactly and to think they don't even know me.
In fairness to nonny that's how I view that phrase too.
That doesn't mean I don't find racism hilarious and stimulating though.
Hey Nonny, don't sweat it. It's largely gone out of usage.
Spade has a heavy negative connotation in the U.S.
Why is it that fuck nut parents like this never wonder that maybe if you god tells you to torture your kids then maybe you should stop listening.
How much better would the world be without religion. I'm liking this blog more and more and after this particular statement....
Why not David 'not even slightly funny and never was or ever will be not in my life time or yours anyway the unfunny insulting gooch-faced twat' McSavage?
... I think I'm in love!!! <swoon>
Talk about an open and shut case of shocking cruelty, hopefully these two will be doing proper jail time.
Nonny, please stick to posting
about dresses, you are far less offensive that way!
I didn't fucking say anything derogatory.
Wouldn't it be lovely if we still boiled people in oil.
Nut fritters make excellent harvest offerings unto several Gods of my ken. Some really nasty piece of work Gods who demand a nice purifying deep-frying on high holy days.
We've stopped boiling people in oil? Not where I'm from they haven't.
"I bet they got off with it because they are black or Christian or insane " - nope, not derogatory at all.
i'm moved to say an eye for an eye - see how bloody religious they are then
Oh, there's batshit crazy people everywhere. There's just been the case down here of a twenty-two year old mother whose died as a result of an exorcism. She is thought to have drowned when a member of her 'healing group' held her under water, while trying to drive out an evil curse. It was a a 'maketu' - a Maori lifting ceremony to get rid of the curse. What they didn't get is that if you hold someone under water for long enough, while it may well drive out the evil spirit, it's more likely to drive out the life of the person first. It's called, um, drowning.
Sheesh, what’s wrong with that, it seems a valid point. If you commit a terrible crime why should who or what you are excuse you from punishment. As I said people look for things to have a go about. Not a very admirable attribute.
I don't think it is very fair to bring their colour, creed or mental capacity into it. A terrible thing has been done - but the going down the road of associating the crime with someone's colour or religion (or indeed their gender or where someone is from) is simply not a fair thing to do, and leads to people being unfairly stereotyped.
To me, the point is not that "... who or what you are excuse you from punishment."; but that punishment will be meted out without regard to "... who or what you are ..." - so to suggest "I bet they got off with it because they are black or Christian or insane or some under pathetic reason" simply feels wrong and prejudicial to me.
Sheesh: I think thats what nonny was tryin to say - she was just pointing out that the justice system/defence team will probably come up with some bullshit excuse.
Thank you Sheepy that is all I was (feebly) trying to say.
Sheesh - I have to take issue with some of your points. I don't believe in positive discrimination which favours anyone over anyone else, regardless of where they've come from. We have a horrible situation in the UK where people are practising "honour" killings, which is considered acceptable in their mother country (India, Pakistan). Young women are being murdered, by their own families. Many African immigrants bring beliefs in voodoo and other rituals such as the one FMC posted about which is also acceptable in their mother country. They must obey the laws of their adopted country and if this takes draconian punishments to enforce, or, in some cases, repatriation, then bring it on.
I completely agree with you, that is exactly what I was saying, human rights and eqality prevail before everything else. I was just saying that a peson should not be given a lighter sentance because of who they are. Perhaps I wasn't very clear in my initial post.
Agreed Shebah. When in Rome, and all that. I think I'd live by the local laws in Saudi or Singapore.
I was saying that if something is wrong, well let that stand on its own merits (or lack of) - and not bring colour or creed into it.
Murders are committed every day, by people of varying backgrounds/ethnicities/beliefs, for varying motives ('honour' included). I just think that it is a rocky road to go down to automatically link the race/religion with the crime, and that this leads to terrible generalisations.
I am not at all saying treat people any differently in law because of their race/religious beliefs - I am saying don't bring race/religious belief into it. What these people did was child abuse, pure and simple.
Conan: The flip side of that is, would you let a woman be stoned to death for adultry if you were living in Saudi Arabia? It is legal after all...
Post a Comment
<< Home